Former shadow chancellor Ed Balls has criticised the government’s plans to cut disability benefits, stating on his podcast that the policy is “not going to work.” He argued that reducing disability benefits for those who cannot work to fund other spending priorities is unjust and goes against Labour’s values.
“It’s one thing to say the economy is not doing well, and we’ve got a fiscal challenge,” Balls said. “But the context we’re now in is that we are having to increase defence spending, and two weeks ago, it was announced we’re going to cut international aid. But cutting the disability benefits of the most vulnerable in our society who can’t work to pay for that is not going to work. And it’s not a Labour thing to do. It’s not what they’re for.”
Balls further emphasised that the issue goes beyond just economics. He highlighted the moral and ethical implications of such cuts, arguing that society must protect its most vulnerable members. “When people rely on disability benefits, it is not out of choice but necessity. Removing that safety net could push thousands into extreme poverty,” he warned.
What Did George Osborne Say About Freezing Pip?
George Osborne, the architect of welfare cuts during the coalition government, also weighed in on the issue. He revealed that he had resisted freezing personal independence payments (Pip) during his tenure as chancellor, believing it went too far.
“I didn’t freeze, Pip. I thought [it] would not be regarded as very fair. What I did try to do was reform Pip,” Osborne said. He recalled that his final attempt to adjust payment to the homeless, particularly for those who could do some work, ultimately led to the resignation of then-work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith.
“I had to back down on it. And so it’s all very well saying ‘don’t go for the general freeze, it’s not fair.’ However, in politics and often for the Treasury, general freezes have been easier to sell than specific reforms that cut in cash terms the payments that certain sections of the disability benefits-claiming community received,” he added.
Osborne also acknowledged that while welfare reforms were necessary at times, they needed to be implemented carefully to avoid disproportionately affecting those who rely on them the most. “There is always a fine balance between fiscal responsibility and social responsibility,” he stated.
How Much Will Be Cut from Pip Under Current Plans?
Under the latest proposals, nearly £6 billion of cuts will be drawn primarily from Pip. The eligibility criteria for this key disability benefits program will be tightened, and some payments are expected to be frozen.
Critics argue that these changes will make it significantly harder for those in need to access financial assistance. “Many people who rely on Pip already struggle with daily living costs. A freeze or reduction in payments will only exacerbate their difficulties,” one disability rights advocate stated.
Furthermore, concerns have been raised about the assessment process. Many individuals with disabilities have reported facing unfair evaluations that fail to account for the complexities of their conditions. “The assessment system has been flawed for years, and tightening eligibility criteria will only add to the suffering of those in genuine need,” another campaigner added.
What Is Keir Starmer’s Stance on These Reforms?
Speaking during a visit to Hull, Labour leader Keir Starmer insisted that the current disability benefits system “can’t be defended on economic terms or moral terms.” He argued that the structure discourages people from attempting to enter the workforce due to the risks involved.
“We’ve set up a system that says: ‘If you try the journey from where you are into work and anything goes wrong, you’ll probably end up in a worse position than when you started.’ And so, understandably, many people say: ‘Well, I’m a bit scared about making that journey.’ Therefore, we’re baking in too many people not being able to get into work.”
Starmer reiterated that while reforms to the welfare system were necessary, they should not come at the cost of pushing vulnerable individuals further into hardship. “We must create pathways that support people into work rather than penalising them for circumstances beyond their control,” he stated.
When asked whether these changes signaled a return to austerity, Starmer responded: “We’re the party of work. We’re also the party of equality and fairness, but we’re not returning to austerity. That’s what I said before the election. That’s what I say now.”
How Are Disability Advocacy Groups Responding?
Disability rights organisations have expressed significant concerns over the proposed cuts, warning that they could lead to increased hardship for many individuals who rely on disability benefits. Some groups have pointed out that previous welfare reforms have already led to increased financial instability for disabled individuals and their families.
“We’ve seen time and time again how welfare cuts disproportionately impact disabled people, pushing many into debt and even homelessness,” said one campaigner. “The government needs to rethink its approach and ensure that the most vulnerable are not left without support.”
Advocates have also called for greater transparency in the decision-making process. “There needs to be more consultation with those directly affected by these policies. Without their input, these reforms risk doing more harm than good,” another rights group stated.
What Do the Latest Figures Say About the Rise in Universal Credit Claims?
New figures from the Department for Work and Pensions show a sharp rise in the number of people receiving the highest rate of universal credit without support to find work. Since the pandemic, this figure has nearly quadrupled. Among those under 25, the increase is even more dramatic, with numbers rising 249%, from 46,000 to 160,000.
The department acknowledged that a rise in those classified as having “limited capability for work-related activity” was expected due to the transition to universal credit. However, the surge has gone “far beyond projections.”
Experts believe that the pandemic has played a significant role in these numbers. “Many individuals developed long-term health conditions or disabilities due to COVID-19, and the welfare system has struggled to keep up with the increased demand,” one economist explained.
Looking ahead, analysts warn that further cuts to disability benefits could lead to even greater financial instability for those affected. “We need to focus on solutions that provide genuine support rather than simply reducing costs at the expense of vulnerable people,” one policy expert advised.
What Comes Next?
With discussions surrounding disability benefits cuts intensifying, political leaders, advocacy groups, and citizens are calling for a balanced approach. While fiscal responsibility remains a priority for the government, there is growing pressure to ensure that economic decisions do not disproportionately harm those in need.
As the debate continues, the question remains: How can policymakers create a fair and effective welfare system that supports individuals while maintaining economic stability? For now, those impacted by the proposed changes are left in uncertainty, hoping that their voices will be heard in the discussions ahead.
Add a Comment