The Northern Ireland Assembly has voted to continue with the special Brexit trading arrangements for another four years. This decision will maintain some European Union trade laws in the region. Despite strong opposition from unionist quarters, the vote was passed with 48 in favor and 36 against, reflecting the deep political divisions that have characterized Northern Ireland’s response to Brexit. This vote marks a significant moment in post-Brexit Northern Ireland, where the debate over customs and regulatory rules has remained a source of tension.
How Divided is the Assembly on the Issue?
The vote on the continuation of the Windsor framework highlighted the longstanding divisions between unionist and nationalist parties. Unionist members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) voted against the proposal, while nationalist and non-aligned members, such as the Alliance Party, supported it. Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn confirmed that the government would proceed with the law and commission an independent review of the arrangements’ functioning. He emphasized the government’s commitment to “implementing the Windsor framework in good faith” while ensuring stability for Northern Ireland, its businesses, and traders. “The government remains committed to protecting the UK internal market in a way that works for Northern Ireland,” he said.
What Were the Main Points of Debate?
The debate surrounding the vote was intense, lasting almost five hours. A member of the Social Democratic Labour Party (SDLP) described it as “triggering” as unionist members once again revisited Brexit-related concerns. At the heart of the debate was the continued application of Articles 5 to 10 of the Windsor framework, covering customs procedures, VAT and excise duties, the single electricity market, and state aid rules.
Emma Little-Pengelly, the deputy first minister, expressed the Democratic Unionist Party’s (DUP) position: they would “continue to fight to restore Northern Ireland’s place within the UK fully.” This includes removing EU law and any barriers it creates within the UK’s internal market. “We need to strive for something better,” Little-Pengelly stated, reaffirming the DUP’s commitment to a future free from EU influence.
Can the Framework Lead to Stability or Continued Tensions?
The Alliance Party’s Naomi Long, the justice minister, countered that continuing to let Brexit dominate Northern Ireland’s politics would do no one any good. She argued it was time to move forward, stating, “It helps no one to allow Brexit to be a constantly open wound.” Long voted in favor of the arrangements, asserting that it was necessary for Northern Ireland to “move forward” and make progress, even if the protocol was not perfect.
Matthew O’Toole, the leader of the SDLP, also supported the framework, emphasizing the need for a forward-looking approach: “There needs to be a focused effort on improving things,” he said. However, not all parties shared this sentiment. Steve Aiken of the Ulster Unionist Party called for a united opposition to the Windsor framework, stating that the “strongest message” to Brussels and London would be a vote against the continuation of the framework.
Why is the DUP Still Opposed to the Framework?
Tuesday’s vote was the first significant test of the compromise deal negotiated by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in February 2023. Despite the agreement, the DUP remains firmly opposed to the framework. Jonathan Buckley, a DUP MLA, dismissed the vote as “an illusion of democracy” and criticized the government’s stance, claiming that London ultimately controls which laws prevail under the arrangements.
The Windsor framework was introduced after years of opposition from unionist parties, particularly the DUP, over issues such as the checks on fresh farm produce from Great Britain. Under the framework, goods from Britain destined to remain in Northern Ireland pass through a “green lane,” while those intended for the Republic of Ireland and the EU use a separate “red lane.”
Is the Windsor Framework a Compromise or a Controversy?
The Windsor framework also lifted bans on importing seed potatoes and 11 types of native British trees and relaxed EU rules on moving pets from Northern Ireland to Great Britain. For Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour Party, the framework remains the only viable option for stability in Northern Ireland. “The Windsor framework is the only viable basis for stability in Northern Ireland,” Starmer asserted.
Materials released before the vote described the framework as a “compromise to meet the unique circumstances of Northern Ireland” after Brexit. However, the European Union has clarified that resetting broader UK-EU relations depends on fully implementing the framework, including establishing permanent border control posts.
What Are the Concerns About a Democratic Deficit?
The vote has sparked criticism from several Northern Irish peers, particularly over the lack of a cross-community support requirement. The decision has been condemned as creating a “democratic deficit,” with unionists arguing that their concerns are disregarded due to their minority status in the assembly.
Lord Hay, the former speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly, expressed concerns that a simple majority vote allowed the concerns of unionists to be ignored. He warned, “A simple majority vote creates a democratic deficit as the concerns of unionists, who are in the minority in the assembly, can be just ignored: ‘Forget about them, let them sit over there, they will be alright, and we’ll just change the laws, we’ll change the procedures in the assembly to suit whoever it needs to suit.'”
Unaffiliated peer Baroness Hoey also criticized the decision, calling it a “shameful day” for the current and previous government. “What we’re seeing there is a move towards going back to a kind of majority rule within the assembly,” she said, adding that controversial issues should always require cross-community support.
What Does the Future Hold for Northern Ireland?
Despite the ongoing divisions, the decision to extend the special trading arrangements represents a significant moment in Northern Ireland’s post-Brexit trajectory. As the debate over the Windsor framework continues, it is clear that the region remains divided on its future path. The question is whether the framework will provide long-term stability or continue to fuel tensions between unionists, nationalists, and the British and Irish governments.
Add a Comment